5. Rating the quality of evidenceAuthor(s)Jo.RobaysJoan.VlayenPrinter-friendly versionLog in to post comments5.1. Introduction5.2. Study limitations, risk of bias5.3. Inconsistency5.4. Indirectness5.5. Imprecision5.6. Publication bias5.7. Reasons to upgrade studiesBook traversal links for 5. Rating the quality of evidence‹ 4. Summarizing the evidenceUp5.1. Introduction ›
